![Institutional Repository [SANDBOX]](images/dias.logo.png "Institutional Repository [SANDBOX]"){kind=logo}
Institutional Repository [SANDBOX]
Technical University of Crete
Technical University of Crete
EN
|
EL
| URI | http://purl.tuc.gr/dl/dias/C229C66D-28F9-4833-9C0B-6110F4A36E7E | - |
| Identifier | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sampre.2022.100045 | - |
| Identifier | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582022000420 | - |
| Language | en | - |
| Extent | 4 pages | en |
| Title | Corrigendum to: A tutorial on AGREEprep an analytical greenness metric for sample preparation | en |
| Creator | Pena-Pereira, Francisco Javier | en |
| Creator | Tobiszewski, Marek | en |
| Creator | Wojnowski Wojciech | en |
| Creator | Psyllaki Eleftheria | en |
| Creator | Ψυλλακη Ελευθερια | el |
| Publisher | Elsevier | en |
| Description | Refers to “A tutorial on AGREEprep an analytical greenness metric for sample preparation” which was published on August 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sampre.2022.100025 | en |
| Content Summary | The authors have noticed that the parameter assigned in Criterion 3 (Target sustainable, reusable, and renewable materials) during the evaluation of the second method involving SPME was not correct. As a result, the assessment results appearing in Fig. 3 were also not correct. The parameter assigned for this Criterion should have been “Only sustainable and renewable materials are used several times” with a score=1.0, rather than “< 25% of reagents and materials are sustainable or renewable and can only be used once” with a score=0.0. The latter parameter was not correct nor in accordance with a past report published by the same authors (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2022.116553). The correct versions of Fig. 3 and Fig. S3A, Fig. S3B, Fig. S3C are given below and the discussion concerning Scenario 2 in the second evaluated method involving SPME should be as follows: ........ “On the other hand, the final score of Scenario 2 (promoting safe chemicals/materials) was superior to the one obtained when applying the default weights, mainly due to the absence of non-sustainable materials and the green and “safe” features inherent to the SPME technology.” The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused. | en |
| Type of Item | Τυπογραφικό Λάθος | el |
| Type of Item | Erratum | en |
| License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en |
| Date of Item | 2024-04-11 | - |
| Date of Publication | 2022 | - |
| Bibliographic Citation | F. Pena-Pereira, M. Tobiszewski, W. Wojnowski, and E. Psillakis, “Corrigendum to: A tutorial on AGREEprep an analytical greenness metric for sample preparation,” Adv. Sample Prep., vol. 4, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.sampre.2022.100045. | en |
Copyright © DIAS 2013
