URI | http://purl.tuc.gr/dl/dias/C538DBB8-910E-40EF-9D86-960758B257CB | - |
Identifier | https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-31 | - |
Identifier | https://pure.hud.ac.uk/en/publications/legal-representation-and-reasoning-in-practice-a-critical-compari | - |
Language | en | - |
Extent | 10 pages | en |
Title | Legal representation and reasoning in practice: a critical comparison | en |
Creator | Batsakis Sotirios | en |
Creator | Μπατσακης Σωτηριος | el |
Creator | Baryannis George | en |
Creator | Governatori, Guido | en |
Creator | Tachmazidis Ilias | en |
Creator | Antoniou, Grigoris | en |
Publisher | IOS Press | en |
Content Summary | Representation and reasoning over legal rules is an important application domain and a number of related approaches have been developed. In this work, we investigate legal reasoning in practice based on three use cases of increasing complexity. We consider three representation and reasoning approaches: (a) Answer Set Programming, (b) Argumentation and (c) Defeasible Logic. Representation and reasoning approaches are evaluated with respect to semantics, expressiveness, efficiency, complexity and support. | en |
Type of Item | Κεφάλαιο σε Βιβλίο | el |
Type of Item | Book Chapter | en |
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en |
Date of Item | 2019-10-22 | - |
Date of Publication | 2018 | - |
Subject | Legal knowledge representation | en |
Subject | Legal reasoning | en |
Subject | Normative reasoning | en |
Bibliographic Citation | S. Batsakis, G. Baryannis, G. Governatori, I. Tachmazidis and G. Antoniou, "Legal representation and reasoning in practice: a critical comparison," in Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2018, vol. 313, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Amsterdam: The Netherlands, IOS Press, 2018, pp. 31-40. doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-31 | en |
Book Title | Legal Knowledge and Information Systems | en |
Book Series | Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications | en |