![Institutional Repository [SANDBOX]](images/dias.logo.png "Institutional Repository [SANDBOX]"){kind=logo}
Institutional Repository [SANDBOX]
Technical University of Crete
Technical University of Crete
EN
|
EL
| URI: | http://purl.tuc.gr/dl/dias/C538DBB8-910E-40EF-9D86-960758B257CB | ||
| Year | 2018 | ||
| Type of Item | Book Chapter | ||
| License |
|
||
| Bibliographic Citation | S. Batsakis, G. Baryannis, G. Governatori, I. Tachmazidis and G. Antoniou, "Legal representation and reasoning in practice: a critical comparison," in Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2018, vol. 313, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Amsterdam: The Netherlands, IOS Press, 2018, pp. 31-40. doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-31 https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-31 | ||
| Appears in Collections |
Representation and reasoning over legal rules is an important application domain and a number of related approaches have been developed. In this work, we investigate legal reasoning in practice based on three use cases of increasing complexity. We consider three representation and reasoning approaches: (a) Answer Set Programming, (b) Argumentation and (c) Defeasible Logic. Representation and reasoning approaches are evaluated with respect to semantics, expressiveness, efficiency, complexity and support.
Copyright © DIAS 2013
