Institutional Repository [SANDBOX]
Technical University of Crete
EN  |  EL

Search

Browse

My Space

Legal representation and reasoning in practice: a critical comparison

Batsakis Sotirios, Baryannis George, Governatori, Guido, Tachmazidis Ilias, Antoniou, Grigoris

Full record


URI: http://purl.tuc.gr/dl/dias/C538DBB8-910E-40EF-9D86-960758B257CB
Year 2018
Type of Item Book Chapter
License
Details
Bibliographic Citation S. Batsakis, G. Baryannis, G. Governatori, I. Tachmazidis and G. Antoniou, "Legal representation and reasoning in practice: a critical comparison," in Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2018, vol. 313, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Amsterdam: The Netherlands, IOS Press, 2018, pp. 31-40. doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-31 https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-31
Appears in Collections

Summary

Representation and reasoning over legal rules is an important application domain and a number of related approaches have been developed. In this work, we investigate legal reasoning in practice based on three use cases of increasing complexity. We consider three representation and reasoning approaches: (a) Answer Set Programming, (b) Argumentation and (c) Defeasible Logic. Representation and reasoning approaches are evaluated with respect to semantics, expressiveness, efficiency, complexity and support.

Services

Statistics