Ιδρυματικό Αποθετήριο [SANDBOX]
Πολυτεχνείο Κρήτης
EN  |  EL

Αναζήτηση

Πλοήγηση

Ο Χώρος μου

Legal representation and reasoning in practice: a critical comparison

Batsakis Sotirios, Baryannis George, Governatori, Guido, Tachmazidis Ilias, Antoniou, Grigoris

Πλήρης Εγγραφή


URI: http://purl.tuc.gr/dl/dias/C538DBB8-910E-40EF-9D86-960758B257CB
Έτος 2018
Τύπος Κεφάλαιο σε Βιβλίο
Άδεια Χρήσης
Λεπτομέρειες
Βιβλιογραφική Αναφορά S. Batsakis, G. Baryannis, G. Governatori, I. Tachmazidis and G. Antoniou, "Legal representation and reasoning in practice: a critical comparison," in Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2018, vol. 313, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Amsterdam: The Netherlands, IOS Press, 2018, pp. 31-40. doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-31 https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-31
Εμφανίζεται στις Συλλογές

Περίληψη

Representation and reasoning over legal rules is an important application domain and a number of related approaches have been developed. In this work, we investigate legal reasoning in practice based on three use cases of increasing complexity. We consider three representation and reasoning approaches: (a) Answer Set Programming, (b) Argumentation and (c) Defeasible Logic. Representation and reasoning approaches are evaluated with respect to semantics, expressiveness, efficiency, complexity and support.

Υπηρεσίες

Στατιστικά