![Institutional Repository [SANDBOX]](images/dias.logo.png "Institutional Repository [SANDBOX]"){kind=logo}
Institutional Repository [SANDBOX]
Technical University of Crete
Technical University of Crete
EN
|
EL
| URI: | http://purl.tuc.gr/dl/dias/E736589D-ED2A-4E16-B559-F294DA2C8E86 | ||
| Year | 2001 | ||
| Type of Item | Peer-Reviewed Journal Publication | ||
| License |
|
||
| Bibliographic Citation | E. Psillakis and N.Kalogerakis,"Solid-phase microextraction versus single-drop microextraction for the analysis of nitroaromatic explosives in water samples," J. Chrom. A, vol. 938, no.1-2, pp. 113–120, Dec. 2001. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01417-0 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01417-0 | ||
| Appears in Collections |
This paper compares solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with a recently developed extraction method called single-dropmicroextraction (SDME) for the analysis of nitroaromatic explosives in water samples. The two techniques are examined interms of procedure, chromatographic analysis and method performance. All practical considerations for both techniques arealso reviewed. SPME requires dedicated apparatus and is relatively expensive, as the fiber’s lifetime is limited. However, ithas the advantages over SDME that it can be easily used for headspace analysis and has lower detection limits for all thetarget analytes. SDME requires more elaborate manual operations, thus affecting linearity and precision.
Copyright © DIAS 2013
